A car accident is a common type in which the percentage of said claim is being challenged. The accident may occur due to several reasons, from over speeding to the negligence of the driver. In case of over speeding, one is fined with partial fault. The damage caused by the other car to yours can be claimed with supporting evidence. In such a case one always has an option to challenge the percentage of fault which is given in terms of a car accident if that does not satisfy him.
Road traffic accident not only gives physical loss but can also cause some real-time psychological trauma as well. The victim in this case can always lodge his complain and demand compensation for the sake of its car’s maintenance. The fault for the car accident includes the maximum maintenance of the car and if the driver is being injured then his treatment also becomes obligatory for the opposite party. In most cases the settlement got finalized at the time of the accident but if the dispute continues then one needs to hire a lawyer to make the respective claim. In such a way, a court decides how much compensation is required to form the side of the affected party. This sometimes becomes troublesome for both parties as it is time-consuming and takes a lot out of it.
The sensible and widely practiced method in this regard is the on-site settlement. At the scene of an accident, the traffic police can act as an arbiter and issue a ticket of fine to the one who is said to be responsible for such a mishap. The settlement agreed on that very point of an accident in terms of cash or promising complete maintenance.
After the settlement, for instance, one feels that the given amount is not worth the accident then he or she can openly challenge the claim. For this, one has to reach out that person sends a notice from the official authority in which it should be stated clearly that why one is challenging the made claim.
The reasons for the challenged claim could be :
The amount is insufficient for the proper maintenance of the car
The medical treatment of the affected person requires more than the given amount
In case of cheque deposit, the cheque got bounced back
Conclusion
The claim of compensation and later the challenging of that very claim is everyone’s right. The right of compensation is termed as a basic human right in every civilized society. There is no other way to satisfy the loss than to pay a notable amount to the victim. In some cases the given amount is not sufficient and causes further distress to the affected person, I such a case the law has given leverage to the victim to challenge the very claim and demand more out of it. This truly signifies the importance of claim and also gives a message with amplifies the importance of law and rules set by the authorities.
No comments:
Post a Comment